1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 10, 1964, the land category of the said land was changed to the land category on November 3, 1969, 1) I divided into 505 square meters in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul into 89, 2, 31 square meters in E paddy-gu, 385 square meters, and 2, the land was offered to the general public for a road connecting the public located on the south side of the land. Accordingly, the land was used as a road connecting the land and the Seoul Western-gu, Seoul Western-gu, 203 square meters in a road connected to the land to the public.

3) On April 7, 197, the said land was divided into: (2) 2-1 E 6 and 2-2 B 25 square meters; (2) 20 square meters for E 20 square meters and 20 square meters for E 20 square meters for E 20 square meters on October 20, 1978; and (2) 83 square meters for B 83 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(4) On June 5, 1973, the land category of the above land was changed to a site. On April 7, 1977, the F large 385 square meters was divided into three: three-1 F large 386 square meters and three-2 G large 249 square meters, and the conversion was made between three-1 F large 450 square meters and three-2 G large 823 square meters on October 197.

5) The defendant on January 7, 1988 (wholly amended by Act No. 4381 of May 31, 1991; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) 제4조 제2항, 제5조 제1항, 제27조 제1항에 따라 서울 서대문구 C 대 203㎡ 지상에 3층 건물을 신축하는 것을 허가하였는데, 당시 위 C 토지와 공로를 연결하는 도로인 이 사건 토지의 폭이 구 「건축법」 제2조 제15호가 정한 4미터에 미달한다는 이유로 신축 건물의 건축선을 위 C 토지의 안쪽으로 후퇴시키고 건축선에서 제외된 위 C 토지의 일부와 이 사건 토지를 합하여 위 C 토지와 공로를 연결하는 폭 4미터의 도로로 지정하였다. ◆ 구 「건축법」(1991. 5. 31. 법률 제4381호로 전부 개정되기 전의 것 ...