1. The request for intervention by an independent party intervenor shall be rejected;

2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, as shown in [Attachment A] Nos. 1, 3.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 30, 1968, the Plaintiff completed registration of preservation of ownership as to the land listed in paragraphs 1 and 3 of the attached Table Nos. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”), and the land listed in paragraphs 1 and 3 of the attached Table Nos. 1, 1968 (hereinafter “each of the instant land”).

B. The Intervenor newly constructed a building listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant building”) on each of the instant land on September 12, 1987, and completed registration of initial ownership. Defendant B, the Intervenor’s grandchild, on July 14, 2016, donated the instant building from the Intervenor and around that time, and indicated the attached Table No. 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 61 in sequence 34, 210 square meters of the building on each of the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”), 210 square meters of the attached Table No. 344, 366, 67, 68, 69, 70, 41, and 42, 300 square meters of the instant land (hereinafter “the instant building”) and 34, 282, 47, 2844, 282, 301.

C. Defendant E/F leased the instant building from the Intervenor and occupied the instant building in common at present. Defendant G leased part of the land of this case from the Intervenor and occupied part of the land of this case, and Defendant G also owned the instant building on the land of this case, and in sequence connected each point of 53, 54, 55, 56, and 53, the attached Form No. 57, 58, 59, 60, and 57, the attached Form No. 57, 58, 59, 60, and 57, the attached Form No. 16, 71, 72, and 72.