1. The sentence against the accused shall be seven million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On February 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the D Hospital located in C at permanent residence on a permanent basis on February 10, 2017, after completing work at the D Hospital near Smarket near the said hospital, and went home to the said hospital pursuant to E in order to inform the principal and personnel F of his personal information about E, the Defendant: (b) received a report from the principal and staff member of the G District of the permanent police station, and (c) sent to the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Defendant, after receiving a report from 112 that “the Ha was frighting by the drunk; (b) the police officer assigned to the G District of the permanent police station, and (c) the police officer I tried to go home to go home to the patrol vehicle; and (d) took a knee part of the said I’s kne.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reporting duties by police officers in uniform.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Each report on investigation;

112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the report processing table and the fixed place of work;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which committed the instant crime even though the Defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times, including the record of a crime interfering with the performance of like official duties, committed the instant crime. This is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant.

The Defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and reflects them.

I accepted the defendant's intention and expressed his intention to seek the defendant's prior action.

It seems that the social ties of the defendant are not bad.

This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

In addition, in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the arguments and records of the case, such as the age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.