logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.03.22 2018고단1849
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The Defendant shall pay C Q Q Q, an applicant for compensation KRW 400,000.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On February 7, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on December 30, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

around March 18, 2018, the Defendant called “2018 Highest 1849” to read “CR’s promise prepared by the victim CSS to the victim by accessing the Internet homepage “CR” in which it is difficult to know the trade name in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Daejeon, and by using a cell phone, that “The victim will act as an agent for the hotel hotel and airline ticket reservation prepared by the victim at the time of deposit of money.”

However, the Defendant did not perform the business such as hotel reservation and thought to use the money received from the victim as living expenses or gambling funds, so even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to make a hotel reservation or airline ticket reservation as proxy.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3,800,000 from the victim’s BZ account (Account Number CA) in the same day from the victim, and acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount by receiving KRW 6,700,000 in total five times from around that time to June 7, 2018 in the same way as indicated in the attached crime sight table.

At around 08:00 on June 12, 2018, the Defendant reported the detailed travel-related questions posted by the victim Q Q Q on the Internet website, and told that he/she will act on behalf of the victim, by visiting the victim, to the "ICT" website, an Internet homepage, at the middle-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City Twit-dong.

However, the Defendant did not perform his duties as agent, and was thought to use the money received from the victim as living expenses or gambling funds, so even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to do so.

The Defendant above.

arrow