logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.27 2014가합581535
유언무효확인청구등
Text

1. Ascertainment that a will made on January 7, 2007 by the deceased F by a certificate of completion is null and void.

2. The plaintiffs remaining.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The F (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) died on November 13, 2013, and his heir is Defendant D, E, Plaintiff A, and B, the deceased’s spouse.

On January 7, 2007, the deceased's "B(F)" refers to "B(C) and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu (D) will leave all of the property (F) to the above two persons, with the intention of "B(D)' on his/her own initiative on January 7, 2007, which means that "B(F) will not cause any dispute over property between punishment and punishment."

was drawn up.

The Deceased shall attach attached Form to his/her own pen on April 9, 2012

1. To make the same will as the description "the will of 2012";

was drawn up.

Attached Form as active property of the deceased at the time of death

2. There was only each real estate recorded in the list.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 through 4 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the whole purport of pleadings, and the plaintiffs' claims for confirmation of invalidity of will will in 2012 are invalid since the will will of 2012 was forged.

The building of "Seoul-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G2", which is described as the inheritance to Defendant E in the will in 2012, is a building with no registered record, and the above will is null and void because its content is not specified.

Even if "Seoul City G2" is indicated in the attached Form

2. Even if the building listed in paragraph 2 of the list appears to be heighted, the deceased entered the testamentary gift in the will of 2012 in "G" and "G", and the subject matter of the testamentary gift is stated in attached Form on the testamentary gift.

2. The deceased’s expression of intent is unclear as to whether the land listed in paragraph 3 of the list is included, and if it is included in the subject of testamentary gift, it is invalid because the content of the will is not specified.

Judgment

In full view of the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of the written appraisal by appraiser H on the assertion of forgery, 2012.

arrow