1. On February 15, 2019, the Seoul Family Court Decision 2018 Madan9608 (hereinafter “Seoul Family Court”) affixed a seal of approval on the case where a testamentary document is approved.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on June 28, 2018, and at the time of the deceased’s death, the deceased was the heir, who was the South-North E/W, the deceased, and the second South-North Defendant.

B. On December 18, 2018, the death of the deceased, the Seoul Family Court 2018 Ma9608, the Plaintiff applied for the approval seal of the testament certificate. On December 26, 2017, the name of the deceased, which was subject to the approval seal, is as follows (the title of the testament of this case consists of two pages. The first chapter contains the name, resident registration number, and address of the deceased under the title of the testament of this case, and the following is written. The second chapter contains the content of the will, the date of preparation, the name of the deceased is written, and the name and address of the present E, and the name and address of the present E is written, and the signature and address of the present E is affixed, and the second chapter bears the seal of the signature of the latter, and the Plaintiff made a statement to the effect that “the deceased was not the deceased’s body,” which was written by the deceased with respect to the particulars of the custody of the testament of this case in the above procedure.

1 His/her will CDD Kimpo-si F, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City I apartment Ja of the G Building H, which is in the F of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

2 Inheritance of K Apartment L from Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City to A.

On December 26, 2017, E (person without the presence of C originator C (person) (person without the presence) Kimpo-si, Gyeonggi-do.

f. HG building (applicable: Fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 10, Eul evidence 1, purport of all pleadings and arguments);

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The plaintiff's testament of this case argues the validity of the testament of this case by the defendant, co-inheritors, even though the deceased's testament was made by his own completion document.