beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, along with C, D, and E, conspired to forge the lease contract of G apartment in the name of G by using the personal information of G, the lessor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 103, 403, 503 (Lease KRW 20,000,00), which was leased by E, to acquire money as collateral.
1. On October 18, 2012, the Defendant, along with D and E, found in the “J” office operated by the I located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City H, and the Defendant was G, and E, with the purport that “When the original lease contract was lost, 80,000 won will be paid if the original lease contract was created,” the Defendant: (a) used a computer to believe I would make use of the computer; (b) 103-403 of the apartment rent contract; (c) one billion won in the seat column “F apartment rent contract; (d) one hundred million won in the face column (Won 190,00,000,000); (d) the lessor’s address, resident registration number; and (e) the name and address of the lessee; and (e) the name and address of the lessor after printing it out, and (e) the Defendant had the name and address of the EG printed it next to the date of preparation.”
Accordingly, the suspect, in collusion with C, D, and E, has forged one chapter of the apartment lease contract in the name of G in the name of G, a private document related to rights and obligations without authority.
2. On December 27, 2012, the Defendant in collusion with C, D, and E, introduced C, and D to M at the “law firm L” office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was committing G happiness. The Defendant was committed as if he was a lessee of the deposit amount of KRW 190 million, and E was committed as if he was a lessee of the deposit of KRW 190 million, and the apartment lease agreement under the name of G, as described in paragraph 1, was completed, presented to M as if it was genuine.