Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 28, 2014, the Defendant of a private document forgery is up to May 28, 2016, the period of “1,00,000 won for E and 1,000 won for deposit column,” and “2,00,000 won for the term column” in the form of the apartment pre-sale contract, which was kept at the D A certified brokerage office located in the Gu in Ansan-si, Seoul, using a shot-type pen, in the location column.

'Before entering 'B', 'J, I, J, and K' in the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea, and signing

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of the apartment lease contract in the name of K, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant exercised the said investigation document as if it were a document that had been duly formed with the delegation of the lessor K to L, a lessee under the said apartment lease agreement, who was aware of the forgery at the above time and at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. A copy of lease agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (report on the preparation and confirmation of an apartment pre-sale contract);

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of Article 231 of the same Act on Private Document) and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act on criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant presented a copy of the apartment lease contract forged as stated in the facts charged at the time and place indicated in the judgment; and (b) enticed the victim as if he consented to the lessor K to newly conclude the lease contract by increasing the lease deposit amount of KRW 10 million.

The defendant was given 10 million won in cash from the injured party in the name of deposit money for lease on a deposit basis.

2. The judgment of this Court is duly adopted by this Court.