1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2014, at around 22:10, the Defendant: (a) reported on November 2, 2014 that the Defendant, while drunkd at the window B of Changwon-si, 112, and called “the police officer D (60 years of age) who belongs to the Changwon Police Station C police box of the Changwon Police Station called “the Defendant’s her mother-gu will be changed to her mother-gu, her mother-gu, her mother-gu, her mother-gu, her mother.” (b) while taking a sudden bath, the Defendant her face was taken once.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, E, and F

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. In order to establish the legal order of the country with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and eradicate the light of the public authority, there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties. In light of the fact that there is a need to strictly punish the crime.

However, considering the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and against the defendant, the fact that the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal records, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances surrounding the occurrence of the crime, the character, conduct and environment of the defendant, etc.