logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.22 2016고정1026
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 5, 2016, around 14:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as: (a) the convenience store and the victim’s convenience store for about two hours under the influence of alcohol at the “D” convenience store in which the Defendant worked as the employee C ( South, 19 years of age).

2. On the same day, the Defendant was arrested in a flagrant act at around 14:30 on the same day, and was transferred to the central box of a mountain power station, and then was under influence of alcohol, and the Defendant stated that the police officer “the bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit

Posium flamea

In the state of drinking, the police box, which is a public office, brupted by very rough words and actions, has led to disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to C and E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with business), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50, and the proviso to Article 42 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant reflects his depth; (b) the treatment of alcohol addiction; and (c) the victim does not want the punishment of the Defendant by agreement with the victim who interfered with his/her duties after the prosecution.

arrow