beta
Text
1. The defendant Ga.
Plaintiff
A 21,00,000 won and for this, 6% per annum from May 15, 2015 to February 18, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 30, 201, the Defendant issued a promissory note (bill No. 5; hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”) with face value 35 million won and due date, October 5, 2011, the NACF branch, Dong-dong branch of the NACF, Incheon Yeonsu-gu D building 519, the place of payment, the place of payment, and the addressee’s blank (bill No. 5; hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”) and delivered to A.
Plaintiff
A endorsed on the first endorsement column, and A delivered A.I.D. the First Promissory Notes to A.I.D. A. A. A. A. A. A. A. A. A, the second endorsement in the column for endorsement and delivered A.I.D. A. B the First Promissory Notes to F. F. F. F. A. The First Promissory Notes were endorsed in the column for third endorsement.
B. On July 2, 2011, the Defendant issued and delivered to A a promissory note (bill No. 1 G; hereinafter referred to as “instant Promissory Notes”) in blank, with the face value of KRW 35 million on July 2, 2011, the due date on October 5, 201, the National Agricultural Cooperatives Federation of Korea, Dong-dong branch of the place of payment, the number of 519 of the issued D Building in Yeonsu-gu Incheon District, the place of payment, and the recipient’s blank.
Plaintiff
A endorsed to the first endorsement column, and delivered H the bill of promise of this case to H, and H endorsed to the second endorsement column and delivered the bill of promise of this case to the Plaintiff A.
C. During the proceeding of the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiffs supplement the addressee of the Promissory Notes Nos. 1 and 2 to the Plaintiff A, and the Defendant was served on May 14, 2015, accompanied by a copy of the Promissory Notes Nos. 1 and 2 supplemented by the payee.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. Even if the place of payment does not include the place of payment for the cause of the claim, if a certain area corresponding to the place of payment is concealed from the entry into the place of payment, the entry into the place of payment can be deemed to be supplemented (see Supreme Court Decision 2000Da7387, Nov. 30, 2001). The place of payment of the Promissory Notes 1 and 2 in blank is the place of payment, but the said place of payment is indicated as the place of payment.