logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.04.26 2017가단139597
어음금
Text

1. Defendant A Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 3,700,000,000 for the Plaintiff and the period from April 23, 2016 to December 6, 2017.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 17, 2012, Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) issued five promissory notes in blank (hereinafter “instant promissory notes”) with the serial number, face value, and initial payment date as indicated below, and with the Gyeonggi-do, the place of payment, the place of payment, and the place of payment, five promissory notes in blank (hereinafter “instant promissory notes”).

Since then, Defendant C Co., Ltd (mutually Co., Ltd. E before the modification; hereinafter “Defendant C”) endorsed and delivered the Promissory Notes to F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).

The issue date of bill number No. 1 of the original issuance date of the bill No. 2 G Co., Ltd. (A) at the second last G Co., Ltd. (A after the change) on August 17, 2012, 2012.

B. Since then, F is the representative director of Defendant C and the director of Defendant A in-house, and each payment date of the Promissory Notes of this case is earlier.

In the same manner as the statement in the statement in the statement, the two times were changed, and the date of the payment was deleted on July 2013 to August 2013, and L affixed the official seal of each representative director of Defendant A and Defendant C, who is the issuer, to the deleted part.

C. On April 4, 2016, the Plaintiff discovered the instant promissory note kept in F’s office’s depository while searching the F’s place of business, a national tax delinquent corporation, and seized it pursuant to the National Tax Collection Act. After the end of endorsement by the director of the tax office of the Korea-U.S. under the Plaintiff’s control for the collection of the amount of national taxes in arrears, the Plaintiff was denied payment on the ground that the instant promissory note was presented to the D Bank’s New Branch, a payment place, but the judgment was rendered on April 22, 2016.

The Plaintiff’s application for public summons with respect to the Promissory Notes of this case.

arrow