The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On the day of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the husband’s husband’s knowledge that R had been wraped with the victims at the victim E’s house; (b) entered the victim’s residence in order to find them; (c) opened a door to enter the room during the time of each other; and (d) opened the victim’s coin with the victim’s door, and did not inflict an injury by intrusion upon the victim E’s residence or by assaulting the victim’s G.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two million won by fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. (1) On April 26, 2015, around 18:00 on April 26, 2015, the Defendant was able to listen to the desire of the victims E at an elementary school at the cafeteria of the “D” restaurant located in the Chungcheongbuk-gun C, and he was able to look at the victim’s residence.

On April 28, 2015, at around 02:30 on April 28, 2015, the Defendant opened a entrance in the victim’s house located in the Chungcheongnam-gun F, Chungcheongnam-do, and opened a new door to the victim’s house, and invaded upon the victim’s residence.

B. At the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant sought the victim’s desire from the victim G (I, 55 years of age) who is a person living together with the above E, and she took the victim’s face once with her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

The Defendant, upon receiving the report 112 as above, discovered the victims who want to open an inner door upon the request of the police officer to respond to the investigation, and found the victims who opened the door and closed the door between the victims, thereby causing injury to the victims, such as the cutting of the pelpel in need of medical treatment for about 21 days.

B. The lower court’s judgment also denied the crime to the same effect as the grounds for appeal, but the lower court based on the evidence duly admitted and examined.