logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.27 2020고단2464
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 11 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 5, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Suwon District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On March 16, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.122% in blood alcohol concentration on March 21, 2020, and the Defendant was driving a C-crin car at approximately one kilometer in a section of approximately 1,34 square meters in front of the river in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, to the third industrial complex distance of approximately 134.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment of previous records and a copy of summary order), and application of one copy of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant committed a second offense despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving; and (b) the fact that the blood alcohol level was not low; (c) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s crime; (d) the fact that the Defendant does not have any traffic accident; (c) the Defendant was punished by a fine; and (d) the fact that the Defendant had no particular criminal record; and (e) the fact that the Defendant supported his family members are considered as favorable to the Defendant; and (e) the judgment is rendered as per Disposition by taking into account all the other factors of sentencing specified in the records of

arrow