logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.05.24 2013고합44
부정처사후수뢰등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From October 1998, the Defendant began to work in the Daegu Regional Police Agency metropolitan investigation group. From March 2006, the Defendant served in the Daegu Southern Police Station investigation and the strong team. From September 201, the Defendant was a police officer who served in the Daegu Southern Police Station C District in the Daegu Southern Police Agency, and became aware of D while taking charge of the investigation into D around 2002.

On the other hand, D was subject to tracking of investigation agencies because it was designated as multiple cases, such as the table of the case of designated receipt and delivery in attached Form D.

"2013, 44"

1. Where it is disclosed externally as to whether a person has been designated as a criminal case in an investigation agency for confidential public duties, there is a risk that a person subject to such disclosure may interfere with the functions of the investigation agency for criminal investigation by means of manipulation of evidence not secured by the investigation agency, preparation of false statements, escape, etc., and where it is disclosed externally as to whether the person subject to punishment execution has been designated as a person subject to punishment execution by the criminal investigation agency for confidential public duties, there is

Nevertheless, around June 15, 2009, the Defendant inquiredd whether D was a designated recipient of D using a criminal information system, etc. used by the Defendant, and notified D that D “it was no longer possible to have been distributed, including the case against Adry E.” from that time to August 25, 201, and then informed D of each inquired information about D, such as the number of the relevant case, the date of the delivery, and the water pipe, etc., from that time to August 25, 201, by informing D of the number and the number of the relevant case, and by providing D with each inquired information about D, including the number and the number of the relevant case, the date of delivery, and the water pipe, respectively.

2. A criminal escape;

A. The Defendant, from Jun. 15, 2009 to Oct. 15, 2009, met with a criminal information inquiry device on and around Jun. 15, 2009, to inform D that “it does not have any number of times against the case at which A NNN speaks.”

arrow