logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 03. 24. 선고 2010두27424 판결
(심리불속행) 질권이 설정된 주식의 양도시기[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu9862 ( November 10, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2009west0938 ( October 26, 2009)

Title

(1) The time when shares are transferred to which a pledge is created.

Summary

(2) The court below held that the transfer of shares takes effect as the transfer of shares takes effect by the intention of the parties to the transfer and the delivery of share certificates, except in special circumstances. However, since a pledge is established only on the value of property in the case of shares for which a pledge is established,

Cases

2010Du27424 Invalidity of the imposition of transfer income tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ Kim

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

The Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu9862 Decided November 10, 2010

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violations of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal does not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissing final appeal by judgment without continuing to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see

arrow