1. Among the instant lawsuits, the introduction of the police science, the police administration science, the introduction of the crimes, the introduction of the law, and the introduction of social welfare.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 31, 2015, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant application”) filed an application for the assessment of the curriculum based on the attendance-based learning unit with the Credit Bank System in 2015 pursuant to Article 3(2) of the Act on Recognition of Credits, Etc. (hereinafter “Recognition of Credits Act”). On September 9, 2015, the Defendant rejected the said application on the ground that the Plaintiff did not supplement the incomplete documents within the filing period.

B. On February 24, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the above rejection disposition, and the Central Administrative Appeals Commission accepted the above request for adjudication, the Defendant conducted an on-site evaluation and assessment assessment of the Plaintiff’s branch office.

C. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition not to evaluate the whole of 20 learning subjects (hereinafter “instant learning subjects”) written by the Plaintiff on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff’s branch points fall short of 99 points with the base point of 105 (150% per 150% per 150% per 150% per 150”) in the evaluation field; and (b) some learning points as indicated in the “List of Application Subjects” as indicated in the attached Table 2015, fall short of 105 points, and fall short of 105 points for deliberation by the Recognition of Credits Deliberative Committee.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

(d) On May 16, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the appeal was dismissed on September 20, 2016. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, evidence 23 through 25, and Eul evidence 1 (each entry in the items including the number of branches, and the purport of the whole pleadings)

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s defense prior to the merits

A. The defendant's assertion.