Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On August 12, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) was found to have been aware of why he/she was about six months before he/she performed a pair of cryp operations in the Seo-gu Daejeon District of Daejeon; (c) was erroneous in doing so; and (d) the Defendant was found to have resisted the victim D (V, 34 years of age) who works for nursing in the above sex surgery as a nursing assistant.
“Along with the defect, the victim reported the fact that he was out of the door without any speech, and committed assault by the victim, such as cutting away the left head and ear on one occasion of the woman’s left head and ear.
2. Determination
A. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged
(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
(c) Declaration of intention of the victim not to punish him/her after public prosecution is instituted: Submission of a written agreement on September 6, 2016;
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;