logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.07.05 2016고단2950
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동협박)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants did not pay a fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 28, 2016, the Defendants: (a) 00:05, the Defendant Company B, who left the back-side table of the victim E (e.g., age 31) and the victim F (e., age 24) from the back-side table of the convenience store located in the petition site C at the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si on August 28, 2016, was fluored and fluord from the back table.

So far, we can see our mind, and we can see how we can see it from time to time, that the dominants were written in writing.

I. The defendant A saw the victims as if he and she had conversations with the staff in the scarcity, such as "I am kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't, and "I amn't kn't kn't" and "I amn't kn't kn't kn't kn't. to the victim E.

“Past crying.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threatened victims.

Summary of Evidence

The application of the laws and regulations on police statements to Defendants E and F

1. Article 2 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. for Criminal Facts, Article 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendants’ mistake and agree with the victims, the degree and age of the Defendants’ participation, and the history of criminal punishment.

arrow