logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.11.07 2018고단878
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 25, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), while driving a DM7 vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.158% in the aftermath of C University located in Si, Gunsan, Si, Gun, B, on the roads of the 0.158% alcohol level in front of the blood alcohol level on the roads following the aftermath of C University located in Si, Gun, MM7, which was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant

A police officer, who was dispatched to the site at the time, had the defendant towing the vehicle of the defendant to tow the vehicle of the defendant while towing the vehicle of the defendant, but the defendant was returned the keys of the towing vehicle to the towing vehicle by the doping that the credit card is attached to the vehicle.

After that, the Defendant 22:50 on the same day, driving the said DM7 car from around 2.5 km to the front road of the F pharmacy located in Gunsan-si, Si, Gunsan-si.

The Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol by a slope H belonging to the G District of the Military Police Station G District, which called the Defendant after receiving a report that the vehicle involved in an accident involving drinking was driving again, and was under the influence of alcohol.

Due to a reasonable ground to determine a person, a drinking test was required.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had already taken a drinking test at the scene of the immediately preceding accident, and there is no reason to take a drinking again, and did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1), is required to take a drinking test from a slope H belonging to the Gunsan Police Station G District H in the Gunsan Police Station, and H, “I sar sar sar sar sar to sarb the fe, but the police officer sar sar sar w

In doing so, the Si guar flab, flab, and assaulted H’s chest part of the chest with the hand floor once, and the body was tightly carried by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the control of drinking alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police of H. H.

arrow