A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 07:57 on April 20, 2018; (b) the police officer, who received a report and called up to 112, did not enter his/her horse well; and (c) the Defendant did not enter his/her horse.

In misunderstanding, the Rabbbs (Iron Products) possessed by misunderstandings led to the C District 4 patrol vehicles D, which are government vehicles, thereby damaging goods used by public offices for the repair cost of KRW 253,00,000.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place mentioned in the above 1.1. At the same time and place, as seen above, and as he was removed from the slope E belonging to the Busan Coastal Police Station Cdistrict, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation by assaulting, such as cutting off the epib, cutting off the epib, cutting off the epib, and cutting off the epic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Photographss and photographs of the upper part of the patrol, pictures of destruction of the glass of the patrol vehicle, and estimates of damage;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (a point of damage to goods for public use, choice of imprisonment), and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties and choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1248, Apr. 1,

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. A second-class crime subject to the sentencing guidelines (the scope of a recommendation) in the basic area (from June to June) of the first-class category (the invalidation of public goods) (the person subject to special sentencing) [the scope of a recommendation]] of the second-class crime in the basic area (the scope of a recommendation] of the sentencing guidelines [the scope of a recommendation] [the scope of a recommendation]] in the basic area (from June to one year and six months), (the special sentencing person] in the basic area (from January to one year and six months), (the special sentencing person] in the multiple-class aggravated punishment without any specific sentencing person: June to February: March;

2. The defendant who has rendered the decision of sentence shall make a confession of all crimes;