Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on August 31, 2012, the Defendant attended the “all-party conference for the resolution on the promotion of the general strike” held in the Seoul Cheongpa-ro Seoul Cheongpa-gu Seoul Cheongpa-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. At around 17:06 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the passage of vehicles from around 1:1 to 10 minutes on August 31, 2012 to around 17:10 minutes on the same day by participating in the conference while occupying approximately 8,800 participants of other assemblies at the intersection in the Jung-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with other participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic on land by other means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. In full view of the circumstances revealed through evidence in the holding, such as internal investigation instructions (including photographs of evidence), internal investigation reports (Attachment of the report of assembly on August 31, 12), internal investigation reports (Attachment of evidential materials and all flow photographs) and accompanying materials [the application of Acts and subordinate statutes can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant interfered with traffic by occupying a road used by the general public along with other participants in assemblies as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court, along with the fact that the traffic was obstructed by occupying the road used by the general public, along with other participants in assemblies, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court, in view of the developments and method leading up to the removal of the road, the size and place of the assembly, the progress of the assembly, and the degree of

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant is relatively minor to participate in the instant crime as a simple participant at the assembly of this case, and that the defendant would respect the legal order in the future and will not repeat the same mistake.