1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that, except for the following determination as to the probative value of evidence No. 7, which is contrary to the facts acknowledged by the court of first instance as evidence submitted additionally by this court, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

According to Gap evidence No. 7, May 4, 2015, 2015, after the lawsuit of this case, the plaintiff could only recognize that the term of the lease continues until a lessor requests the return of the land of this case, and that the lease was continued, and the above fact of recognition alone, further, on April 20, 1990, the plaintiff sold only the land by reserving the ownership of local trees planted in the land of this case to K on April 20, 190.

Since December 12, 2003, L or L purchased the instant land from K, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff continued to lease the instant land from L and exercised its ownership of the said trees.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.