Text
1. The Defendants, on November 1, 199, shall be liable to the Plaintiff as to the Defendants’ inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet among the 585 square meters in the annexed sheet at the time of racing.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 15, 1912, AH 585 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) was assessed against AI on a racing-si.
B. The AI died on March 24, 1963, and the Defendants inherited the rights and obligations of AI regarding the instant land in the same proportion as the inheritance shares of the Defendants attached hereto.
The land in this case is unregistered until now.
C. Meanwhile, from October 1979, AJ, the Plaintiff’s father, has cultivated, occupied, and used the instant land from around October 1979. Whether the possession of the instant land was succeeded to AK, who is a son of AJ, from around December 1993, the Plaintiff, a son of AK, succeeded to the possession of the instant land from around December 1993 to the present time, has occupied and used the instant land by cultivating it.
[Ground for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 54, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the determination as to the cause of the claim, AJ has occupied and succeeded to the land of this case from October 1979, and eventually, AK and the Plaintiff has succeeded to the possession of the land of this case for twenty (20) years including the above possession succession. Since the Plaintiff's possession is presumed to be possession of autonomous, flat, and public performance, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the land of this case by prescription around November 1, 1999 after the lapse of twenty (20) years from October 1, 199.
Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on November 1, 1999 with respect to each inherited share of the instant land to the Plaintiff, barring any special circumstance.
3. Determination as to the defendants' defenses (excluding defendant B and defendant AG)
A. The gist of the defense is that the Plaintiff sold the instant land to AL and the AJ purchased it from AL on October 1979, but the AI sold the instant land to AL.
or AL did not sell the land of this case to AJ.
Plaintiff
(2)