Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Defendant

B. The summary of the judgment on Defendant B is not known to the public.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

Since it is judged not guilty of the facts charged against B, the part of the facts charged that Defendant A conspired with Defendant B was deleted or corrected ex officio.

Defendant

A around January 5, 2010, Defendant B had a vague consultation on the vicarious operation of the Internet shopping mall project for the union members promoted within the G trade union between Defendant B and the side of the G trade union. On the other hand, Defendant B acquired H (hereinafter “H”) under the name of I, a nominal entity that Defendant B had no real entity that was holding, and the fact was that H had entered into a specific agreement with the G trade union, such as selling G’s order products or establishing and operating an online shopping mall in the form of closure that supplies goods to G’s nationwide consumption cooperative stores, and there was no particular substance about the progress of the above online shopping mall project. Therefore, even if receiving investment money from others, even if it did not have any intent or ability to implement the above investment agreement, it was decided to forge the money by means of the agreement, as if the above agreement was concluded finally and finally, to acquire the money under the name of G shopping union head.

1. On January 201, 2010, Defendant A stated that “H links on the G website with the support of lines, facilities, etc. of G, and purchases and sells the shopping mall products, etc. established by H to the nationwide consumption cooperative operators, etc. for various kinds of business support of G, and H pays 2% of the total monthly sales to the G trade union.”