The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did not assault the victim as stated in the judgment below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim made a consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the defendant was at the right buck of the victim due to drinking to the victim,” ② the victim’s denial G who observed the situation at the time also stated in the court of the court below that the victim was at the same time as the victim’s drinking, ③ the victim’s face appears to have been at the right right side after the crime of this case. ④ The police or the court of the court of the court stated that the police or the court of the court of the court only unilaterally met the victim’s right side from the victim, and that there was no fact when the victim was the victim. However, F statements to the effect that the victim was at the time of the defendant’s employer, as the victim’s employee first, who was difficult to buck the victim’s left side, or that the victim was at the time of the victim’s body or the victim’s lack of credibility.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.