The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not infringe the victims, and the court below found the defendant guilty. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below. According to each evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, ① victim FF, G, and H were consistently at an investigative agency to the court of the court below, when the victim was satisfed with his face, when the victim was satisfed with the victim's face, especially F and H, when the victim took satisf with the victim's face, ② The victims clearly stated that the defendant was also included in the court of the court of the court below, ② The victim H was also aware that the defendant was also involved, ③ The victim H was admitted by the court of the court of the court of the court below to the effect that "I, one person among the defendant's daily behaviors, did not have specifically injured the victims, and the victims were also aware of the victim's credibility at the time of the police investigation, and there was no reason to acknowledge that the victim was assaulted by the victim at the time of the police investigation, ④ The victim's witness's statement in the court of the court of the first instance as stated above.

Defendant

At the investigation agency and the court of first instance, B, a co-defendant of the court below, stated that the Defendant did not commit the instant crime, but ① it is difficult to view that B was witnessing the Defendant’s behavior in a confusion situation where the victims were at the time of the instant fighting, and ② it is difficult to view that B was a party to the instant fighting in the instant case.