A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 19, 2017, the Defendant’s intrusion upon a house and theft came into the house of the victim D of the victim of Japan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong 306 Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si on January 19, 2017, and confirmed that there was no person inside the house, and opened the back beer and intruded into the house, and 3.60,000 won in cash, the victim’s market price in the inside the inside of the house, and 10,000,000 won in precious metals (one net gold-gu-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

A theft was committed in 2010,000.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the property.

2. On February 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) intruded into a house and stolen on February 22, 2017; (b) came into the house of the Victim F, Inc. 201 Dong-dong, Sinsan-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do; and (c) came into the house of the Victim F, the first race was divided; and (b) opened a front bend window without being locked and intruded into the house, and then cut up two balms equivalent to approximately one million won in the market price owned by the victim in the insidewest-gu, west-gu, Sinsan-si; and (c) confirmed that there is no person inside the house; and (d) confirmed that there is no person.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and stolen the property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, each ctv closures;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 329 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act committed the instant crime even though he/she was under suspended sentence due to intrusion upon residence, but agreed with the victims after the prosecution.

The punishment shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration all other circumstances.