logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.04.17 2013고단2053 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the business owner who actually runs a sexual traffic business in the name of "F" from the third floor of the Chungcheongbuk-gun E, and Defendant B is the owner of the said business in the name of the business owner due to visual impairment 1st degree.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc.) of Defendant A with 12 massage rooms in the aforesaid “F” (area 932.01 square meters), 6 sugar rooms in which the entrance door is disguised, and 80,000 won per customer if sexual traffic is conducted, and G and H were employed as employees.

On October 1, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant received 170,000 won in cash from customers I, and ordered employees G to enter the I’s body and make a prompt entrance into the I’s sexual organ, as well as from January 4, 2013 to October 1, 2013, the Defendant received money from customers from the above business establishment, and caused G, etc. to engage in similar behavior, such as taking a scam, scam, or rapidly entering the customers’ sexual organ.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts for business purposes.

2. From January 4, 2013 to October 1, 2013, the Defendant assisted the Defendant’s act of arranging sexual traffic by facilitating the criminal acts of the Defendant A, such as lending his name to 2.5 million won per month with the knowledge that the said business place is a place where sexual traffic is conducted, and lending his name to the said place, and doing so in order to engage in sexual traffic, by facilitating the criminal acts of the Defendant A, such as doing the act of arranging sexual traffic, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. of Sexual Traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the Defendants, J, G, K, H, L, M, I, and N

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on field photographing photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

B. Defendant B:

arrow