logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.03 2015고단380
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2014, the Defendant, at around 20:50, 2014. 20:50, she took a heavy bath at a restaurant located in Busan, the Busan, the Defendant: (a) she was arrested by E, a police officer belonging to the Busan, Jin Police Station D District Unit, who was called upon 112 a report; and (b) requested the above F, a police officer belonging to the same district unit, who was called upon with E, to board the patrol vehicle due to suspicion of insult, etc. of the above E, a police officer belonging to the same district unit, who was called upon, and requested him/her to take the patrol vehicle; (c) and (d) said F, she expressed his/her desire to “I would am spice spice, spick, and spick.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of E, F and G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation Sentencing] There is no person who has a basic sphere (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties] [Determination of sentence] The crime of this case committed even though the defendant had been punished several times for violent-related crimes; however, the defendant appears to have an attitude to recognize and reflect the crime; the police officer sought a letter to the above police officer that he does not want the punishment of the defendant (the insulting part against police officer E is revoked).

arrow