The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles, the Defendant only found the victim's spawn part of the victim's spawn even, and did not support the victim's grandchildren.

However, there is no fact that the amount of the cell phone was broken by the defendant while the cell phone was left away at the time, and there is no fact that the amount was broken.

The defendant's act is difficult to be considered as violence, and it is not illegal due to acts that do not violate social rules.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts charged or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 및 법리오해 주장에 대한 판단 피해자는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 ‘피고인이 발로 왼쪽 손등을 찼다. 이에 손에 들고 있던 휴대폰이 떨어져 액정이 깨졌다’는 취지로 진술하였는바, 원심이 적법하게 조사하여 채택한 증거들에 따라 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피해자가 사건 발생 직후인 2018. 1. 18. 00:20경 발안파출소에 방문하여 피해사실을 신고하였고, 그 후 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 공소사실에 부합하는 진술을 한 점, ② 신고 당시 경찰관이 피해자의 휴대폰 액정이 깨져있는 상태를 확인하고 사진으로 촬영하였던 점, ③ CCTV 영상의 내용도 피해자의 진술에 부합하는 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피해자의 진술은 신빙성이 있고, 그 진술에 위 사정들을 더하여 보면, 공소사실은 넉넉히 인정된다.

The following circumstances revealed according to the above evidence, i.e., ① the Defendant’s statement to the effect that he resisted against the Defendant that he did not receive a call from the victim who was under the influence of alcohol only for a long time, as an agent, and that he saw the victim’s hand, etc. by citing the her hand, ② the victim’s cell phone is left away from the ground.