The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not contain any insult the victim as stated in the facts charged, or any statement that impairs the reputation of the victim. Even if the defendant made such remarks, even if the defendant made such remarks, the defendant was able to use Mascke as he was in the state of snific and frozen and sn and sniffic with the sniffic with the sniffic with the sniffic with the snifb

2. Comprehensively considering the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following circumstances revealed by the court below, namely, ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that “the defendant was at the same time as the facts charged. At that time, there was people because it was a past time,” ② from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, consistently stated that “the defendant was able to refer to the victim as stated in the facts charged, to the extent that he was objectively able to hear, to the extent that he was able to hear from others, and there was a person who was obsing.” ③ Although D was an attorney-at-law who accepted a criminal case from the victim, it is difficult to view that D was a lawyer at the risk of punishment on behalf of the victim solely because it was the victim’s counsel, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant publicly insulting the victim as described in the facts charged, and damaged the victim’s reputation by pointing out false facts.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.