The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable for the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended sentence in August, community service, 160 hours, and 40 hours of sexual assault treatment lectures).

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the instant crime, and that he was the first offender.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim D with a minor at the night, and committed assault against the victim F, G, and H that prevents the Defendant from doing so; (b) did not agree with the victims; and (c) did not recover from damage; and (d) did not recover from damage; and (b) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, criminal background, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, even if considering the favorable circumstances in the Defendant’s above, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable and inappropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.