The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is in favor of the fact that the defendant made a confession of each of the crimes of this case while committing a crime of this case and there is no record of criminal punishment for narcotics-related crimes. However, each of the crimes of this case is administered twice by the defendant, publicly obscenity in a state of transshipment after medication, and the quality of the crime is not good due to holding 1.71g of phiphones, and there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate narcotics crimes in light of addiction to narcotics and harm caused by medication, etc., the number of phiphonephones held by the defendant is not large, there are records of criminal punishment several times, and there is no other circumstance after the crime of this case is detained and sentenced 21 days of punishment for violation of discipline. However, the punishment of this case is recommended [the punishment of this case and the punishment of this case cannot be established for 1.7 years of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the above crimes of this case, 3 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the above crimes of this case and its final reasons for concurrent crimes of this case, 1.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.