The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is under favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case, the fact that he surrendered himself to investigative agencies with respect to the crime of medication and possession of phiphones, and the fact that the victim of the crime of destruction of property does not want punishment. However, in light of addiction to narcotics and harm caused by medication, etc., there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate the crime of this case. The defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had the record of punishment two times for the same crime, despite the fact that he committed the crime of this case, even though he had the record of punishment two times for the same crime, the defendant did not have a large amount of 1.4063 g in total. The defendant administered phiphones and handled phiphones up to 1.4063 g., the defendant did not have a large amount of c., the age limit of punishment for the crime of this case to 3 months, the scope of punishment recommended by the Supreme Court on the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.