1. The part concerning the claim for confirmation of invalidity of the failure decision among the lawsuits in this case is dismissed.

2. The defendant shall make the plaintiff 11,589.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a local public enterprise established for the purpose of contributing to the improvement of citizens’ convenience and the development of urban traffic through the construction and operation of traffic-related facilities, such as urban railroads and automobiles. On February 14, 2011, the Defendant publicly announced the implementation plan of the second open competitive recruitment examination for contract-based employment (hereinafter “instant examination”) as follows. Of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”) related to the instant examination,

Notice of the second implementation plan for open competitive recruitment examinations for contractual service, 201

1. One clerical assistant, working on a contract-based assistant, working on a contract-based assistant, working on a non-person with a disability call taxi counselor, who is a contract-based assistant, and 21 employees who are scheduled to be employed in the employment field and the number of persons to be employed;

2. Qualifications for application by field - Persons falling under any of the following subparagraphs - Persons who have a career of driving vehicles for the transportation of mobility disadvantaged persons for at least two years in social welfare fields or in organizations and facilities related to mobility disadvantaged persons - Persons who have a career of driving vehicles for special means of transportation under Article 2 subparagraph 8 of the Act on the Promotion of Convenience of Mobility Disadvantaged Persons for at least one year - Persons who meet the driver qualification requirements prescribed in Articles 49 and 50 of the Enforcement Rule of the Passenger Transport Service Act shall be treated preferentially in accordance with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes.

3. The first selection method: Interviews.

6. Other matters.

(e) Persons eligible for employment protection and support (persons of distinguished services to the State) shall be given preferential treatment under relevant Acts;

(f) No selection may be made if there is no eligible person by recruitment stage. Article 29 (Persons Eligible for Employment Assistance) (1) of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State shall be as follows

1. Soldiers or police officers wounded in action, soldiers or police officers wounded on duty, Order of Military Merit recipients, Order of National Security Merit recipients, student volunteer service recipients, persons wounded in the April 19 Revolution, contributors to the April 19 Revolution, and persons wounded in the April 19 Revolution;