logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.02.14 2018노778
사기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

AF and AD related to the attached list of applicants for compensation attached to the judgment of the court below.

Reasons

The gist of the defendant's appeal is that the punishment sentenced by the court below (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, but in full view of the various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in this case, it is not recognized that the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable since the punishment imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

[However, among the annexed list 1 attached to the judgment of the court below, the "value coupon" in the column for the Criminal Procedure Code No. 47 of the annexed list No. 1 appears to be "value coupon". Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the part related to AF and AD in the list of applicants for compensation attached to the judgment of the court below is clearly erroneous. Thus, it shall be corrected to delete it ex officio pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure

arrow