logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.01.22 2013고단2985
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the owner of A vehicle and the user of B, and B around May 3, 2005, around 10 km-dong 782, the Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority by loading more than 11.25 tons on the second axis of the said vehicle, even though it is a restricted area where it is impossible to operate by loading more than 10 tons per 10 tons per axis-dong 782 Sin-dong 782 Singu, Singu, Sindong Highway-dong 10km-dong 782.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter the same) to the above charged facts charged and prosecuted the defendant, and the summary order subject to review was issued and confirmed around that time.

On October 28, 2010, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that "if an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an act in violation of Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be fined in accordance with the Article concerned (see Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga38, Oct. 28, 2010)" in Article 86 of the former Road Act, which applies to this case, the provision of the Act retroactively loses its effect in accordance with the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

On the other hand, where the penal law or legal provision becomes retroactively null and void due to the decision of unconstitutionality, the defendant's case which was prosecuted by applying the pertinent provision shall be deemed to constitute a crime.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2004Do9037 Decided April 15, 2005, and Supreme Court Decision 91Do2825 Decided May 8, 1992). Thus, the above facts charged constitute a crime and thus, is not guilty pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow