1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the judgment of the court of first instance on the claim of first instance among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 【1.B. Recognition” (2.15 to 3.14 pages 15) shall be followed as follows.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in the statements in Gap evidence 1 through 10, 18, and 22, and Eul evidence Nos. 31, the defendant acknowledged that the plaintiff was habitually punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant during the period from 1985 to 1989 with the defendant, or that the defendant was suffering from the defendant's cryption, such as sexual assault, sexual assault, sexual assault, and sexual assault, and sexual assault, and sexual bruption, etc., but it was not sufficient for the appellate court to acknowledge that the defendant was habitually punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the above 20 years with prison labor for the reason that the plaintiff damaged the plaintiff's reputation by posting on the information and communications network around August 2013 and around September 2013, and that the part of the appellate court declared that the defendant was habitually punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the above 27 years period for the purpose of violating the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Communications Network Utilization (Defamation).