logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.02 2014고단1183
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 1183]

1. The Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) was in conflict with the victim B from around 1986 to around 1989. On April 2009, the victim, elected as the president of the C major president, suffered injury, such as the right-hand senior typology, etc. due to the victim’s assault, and requested the victim to pay hospital treatment and living expenses of KRW 5 million until the age of 80,000 per month, but the victim rejected it.

On September 14, 2013, around 05:03, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “the victim sexual assaulted against the Defendant on the ground that he was not the figure of the Defendant after the Defendant started his teaching system, and her boomed against the Defendant’s breath in his boom,” in his personal block (F) operated by the Defendant, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “the victim expressed sexual assault on the ground that he was not the figure of the Defendant after commencing his teaching system.”

However, there was no desire for the defendant to commit a sexual assault against the victim or to take a bridge against the defendant.

As a result, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by disclosing publicly false information in the information and communication network with the aim of slandering the victim.

In addition, the Defendant, from August 11, 2013 to September 24, 2013, at the location of the Defendant’s residence located in the same 19 times as the attached crime sight table 1 attached hereto, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly exposing false facts on an information and communications network with the intent of slandering the victim, even though the victim did not have any cruel act, such as the victim’s sexual act, etc.

2. Defamation and interference with business;

A. The Defendant, from around 10:00 on September 25, 2013 to around 11:00 on the same day, at the entrance of “H,” where the ceremony of commemoration of the opening of the G C University located in G G in G in G in G in G in terms of economic harmony, was forced by the Defendant during the period when the victim B, the president of C in large president, associates with the Defendant, or conducted harsh acts.

arrow