logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.01.26 2017고단1551
아동복지법위반(아동에대한음행강요ㆍ매개ㆍ성희롱등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 1551]

1. Violation of each child uniforms law against victims D (a child's coercion, intermediary, sexual harassment, etc. against a child);

A. On July 9, 2017, the Defendant came to know of the Victim D (V, 15 years of age, 15 years of age) who is a child through the “E”, a first class of SNS, which is a police officer, around early 2017, and around July 9, 2017, the Defendant had to send our images to the victim.

In order to request the victim to photograph and send a dynamic image that is self-fashed by the victim, and the victim refuses to do so, the victim requested the victim to photograph and send the dynamic image that is self-fashed by the victim, and the victim was sent after having the victim photographed the dynamic image on the same day on the same day, such as “the fash cut by the chest,” “the fashed by the chest,” “the fashed by the fash,” “the fashed by the fash,” “the fashed by the fash,” “the fashed by the fash,” “the fashed by the fashed video on the hand,” and “the fashed by the victim himself.

B. The defendant, like the above paragraph (a), received a video image from the damaged person, and again "I see only once as I am the victim saw."

“Absently known”, “Absently known”

“If known to the victim only,” “The video system is required to be “to be carried out well,” “The victim may go against the foregoing, and despite his refusal, he may know the reasons why he continued to photograph the video of the victim, such as “I am above and below,” and “I am off, Kamer, and sat down and sat down on a bridge, I am to go against the victim’s will on July 10, 2017, and transmitted it.”

Accordingly, the defendant had committed obscene acts to the victim who is a child twice.

2. The Defendant who violated the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Distribution of obscenity) is self-oriented as described in the foregoing paragraph 1.

arrow