beta
Text
Defendant
B shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of ten months.
However, the defendant B is above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
B On December 14, 2016, the Jeonju District Court rendered a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the military service branch of the Jeonju District Court for six months, and on December 22, 2016, the said judgment became final and conclusive.
Defendant
B and A, when selling in lots the land of Pyeongtaek-si C, were urged by D, the owner of the above land, to discharge the remainder of the land, had the owner of E and F, who received the above land as a joint guarantor for the above debt, had the owner of E and F, and had the seal impression issued by Defendant B and F under the pretext that it is necessary for E and F to proceed with the land purchase administrative procedure.
1. Defendant B, on April 2, 2012, may not raise any objection to the issuance of a private document at the office of Pyeongtaek-si G building, or the office of “H” located on the fourth floor of D, with which the name of the Defendant B could not be identified. The employee of D would be at any disadvantage for the payment of KRW KRW 30 million on the day of borrowing, KRW 8% on December 30, 201 on the date of borrowing, KRW 320,000 on the date of borrowing, KRW 320,000 on the date of borrowing, KRW 320,000 on the date of borrowing, and KRW 320,00 on the date of civil, criminal, administrative, civil, and civil complaints due to the said nonperformance (debtor and surety). In addition, the principal (debtor and surety) will be at any disadvantage.
The debtor A, F, 80,000,000 won of the individual guarantee amount, E, individual guarantee amount, 80,000 won of the above debt guarantor E, 80,000,000 won of the individual guarantee amount, and the creditor D D., had A affix the F and E seal impression.
As a result, Defendant B forged a document of borrowing money in F and E without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.
2. The Defendant B, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, exercised the said investigation document by having A deliver as if it were duly formed, one copy of the forged monetary loan certificate to D who was unaware of the fact that it was forged.
Summary of Evidence
1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, and D;
1. Part of the prosecution against the Defendants.