The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. A. On November 4, 2017, at around 13:50 on November 4, 2017, the Defendant threatened the victim by stating, “The victim, who was in charge of the overall management of the union in relation to the reconstruction of Pyeongtaek D apartment, was in conflict with the victim E (83 tax) and the tender for the public tender of construction works, was in conflict with each other, making the victim walk once again, and by raising the person who was in front of the victim, he was in front of the victim, and by raising the person who was in front of the victim, and acting as the victim as he did with the intention of the metal.”

B. In a time, at the same time as in the preceding paragraph, and at the same place, ten persons, including union office employees, were heard by the victim, and the victim publicly insultd the victim by “packer, fined, fined, find, find, find, find, find, find, find, and gind.”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention, crimes subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act, Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Declaration of intention not to punish victims after prosecution;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;