1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Grounds for the court's explanation concerning this part of the facts are stated by the first instance court's judgment.

A. (1) Sub-paragraph (2) 2 of Paragraph 2 of Article 6 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as “he inheritors”)

ii) ‘B’ (hereinafter collectively referred to as “heirs” in total, of the shapes other than F.

'Ro-ro:

B. 1 1 1 13 'Ei, 14 'Ei, 14 'B' and 'Ei, excluding the Defendant' and 'Ei, 17 'Ei, 'B' and 'Ei, 18 'E' among the successors, 'B' and 'Ei, 18 'E', 'B' and the successors, excluding the Defendant:

C. 1) 3, 14, and 18’s inheritors except for the Defendant, “A,” 2, 4, 1, 4 and 18’s inheritors, excluding the Defendant, “B,” as indicated in paragraph 1 of the judgment of the first instance, on the ground that the heirs except for the Defendant, “B,” as indicated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as that of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

2. At the time of the instant subdivision consultation, the Plaintiff’s heir agreed to pay KRW 400 million to the Defendant under the name of the mother’s hospital expenses, etc., and KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, including inheritance tax paid by the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant following the instant subdivision consultation. The heir, other than the Defendant, paid the said KRW 700,00,00 in substitute real estate according to the instant subdivision agreement, but the mother’s mother paid by the Defendant deducted KRW 200,00,00 from the Plaintiff’s hospital expenses, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant was actually borne by the defendant at the above KRW 700 million by taking over the ownership of the real estate in accord and satisfaction amounting to KRW 700 million from the remaining inheritors, other than the defendant, in accordance with the division consultation in this case.