1. The Defendant calculated from March 16, 2017 to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 133,33 on the 16th day of each month until the Plaintiff dies.

With respect to the Plaintiff’s donation of “I” in the form of the entire land of “526 square meters and 506 square meters in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S.J., and the said K large 506 square meters, the Plaintiff is liable for the death of the Plaintiff and the graveyard of the Plaintiff’s husband D (M appears to have been wrong) at the time of death.

Promise: Plaintiff Promise: The Plaintiff, as CB, remains 88.6 years old at the time of the closing of the instant argument.

[A] According to the Plaintiff’s husband D’s transcript (B), the name of the Plaintiff’s husband’s child “G” is indicated as “D”.

E and the Defendant, F, G, H, etc. are deceased (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), and five children are E and the Defendant, F, G, and H.

[A] Among them, the defendant, who is South Korea, has left a son of the I inspection.

[A] On September 2005, the Plaintiff drawn up an agreement with the Defendant on the same content as the right entry on September 1, 2005

[A; hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”). Pursuant to the instant agreement, each land owned by the Plaintiff was transferred on September 8, 2005 to the Defendant on September 1, 2005 due to the gift made on September 1, 2005.

[A] In the instant case, the Plaintiff sought payment of hospital expenses and other arrangement support fees against the Defendant in accordance with the instant agreement. Thus, the Plaintiff will live in the following order.

(1) Hospital expenses: The Plaintiff claimed hospital expenses in 200,000 won a month, but only for the following reasons recognizes “50,000 won a month.”

The average monthly value of hospital expenses (including pharmaceutical expenses) paid by the Plaintiff after January 1, 2014 shall be calculated as of the time of filing the instant lawsuit ( July 29, 2016).

(B) In the event that the Plaintiff’s expenses are retroactive to the hospital expenses in 2005, the average monthly value is lower, while it is apparent in light of the empirical rule that the disbursement of hospital expenses increases due to the aged, and thus, it is not favorable to the Plaintiff. In this case, the hospital expenses incurred by the Plaintiff are the portion of the “patient’s expenses” actually borne by the Plaintiff among the total