A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

During the period of Ansan-si around October 28, 2017, the Defendant had been in front of the convenience store C located in the Gu, and “the person who injured the truth at the convenience store” has been in the same place.

“Abrecing video images to secure evidentiary materials by the victim E during the period of their dispatch after receiving a report of 112, the police box affiliated with the police station,” and “M . Chewing” to the victim.

(1) The Defendant 1 expressed his desire to take pictures as “Ch. S. S.,” and assaulted the victim’s neck on the right hand, such as the victim’s neck on one occasion.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: Consideration of all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, where the nature of the crime in light of the contents of the crime in this case is not less complicated, such as the defendant's assault against the police officer under the influence of alcohol: The defendant has no record of criminal punishment;