logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.07.21 2019구합52414
견책처분취소
Text

The Defendant’s reprimand disposition against the Plaintiff on April 30, 2019 shall be revoked.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (1) On July 18, 2017, B elementary school teachers C filed a report with the principal of B elementary school and the teachers in charge of school violence to the effect that his/her children D, who were enrolled at B elementary school, were subject to school violence from the students in the same class. (2) B elementary school held a council of agencies in charge of school violence around July 18, 2017, around 16:30, July 2017, around 9:30, July 20, 2017, around 15:00, July 20, 2017, and July 13:30, 2017.

(2) On July 20, 2017, the Council of Agencies in Exclusive Charge of School Violence (hereinafter referred to as the “Second Exclusive Organization Council”) held on July 20, 2017, and (3) B elementary schools on August 3, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Autonomous Committee”).

(4) On August 14, 2017, the autonomous committee decided that the school violence case reported by C is not school violence and decided that the school violence case was not school violence case. C requested a review on the resolution of the above autonomous committee.

On September 11, 2017, the Gangwon-do Regional Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence passed a resolution on the measure of “written apology” against two of six aggressor students, and the measure of “psychological counseling and advice” against victim students.

B. (1) From March 1, 2015 to August 31, 2017, the Plaintiff served as an assistant principal at B elementary school from March 1, 2015 to August 31, 2017. (2) The Defendant: (a) reduced and abolished school violence reported by the Plaintiff; and (b) dismissed the Plaintiff on the ground that the teacher E violated good faith and duty to maintain dignity by aiding and abetting the teachers E to report sexual distress against C.

(hereinafter “Prior Dismissal Disposition”). 3 On July 5, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Appeal Commission for Teachers’ Appeal regarding prior dismissal.

On January 16, 2019, it is recognized that the reason why the Plaintiff made a somewhat inappropriate statement at the second exclusive organization council and the autonomous committee. However, the Plaintiff’s reduction and abolition of school violence and sexuality.

arrow