1. As to automobiles listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant C completed the receipt of October 6, 2014 as heading 007028.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 30, 2014, Plaintiff B registered the content that the vehicle was sold at KRW 38.6 million on the SK website in order to sell a vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), which was jointly owned by Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. On September 30, 2014, Nonparty G, an employee of the FF Motor Vehicle Sales Board operated by Defendant C, was called from the deceased on his name, “Is children of Plaintiff B, who will process the instant motor vehicle sales-related procedure on behalf of Plaintiff B,” and exchanged information on the instant motor vehicle, and promised with Plaintiff B, on October 2, 2014, at the H Building parking lot in the Youngdong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

C. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the plaintiff B was called from the person who was not the deceased's name to the effect that "the plaintiff B is a motor vehicle with the motor vehicle that works in I, and would purchase the motor vehicle in this case to the 38.3 million won, so that he would send the employee to report the vehicle," and on October 1, 2014, the plaintiff B notified the account number (J) of the plaintiff A to the person who was not the deceased's name.

G on October 2, 2014, without any person who was unable to receive his name, confirmed the status of the instant vehicle by Plaintiff B through Plaintiff B, and, after explaining the status of the instant vehicle to Defendant C, the purpose was to purchase the instant vehicle to 28 million won by phone to the person who was unaware of his name.

E. G sent the account number (K; hereinafter referred to as “instant account number”) of an enterprise bank (hereinafter referred to as “instant account number”) that received text messages from the person in whose name the text messages were named, and Defendant C transferred KRW 28,80,000 to the said account.

F. Plaintiff B confirmed whether the vehicle purchase price was deposited in the account in the Plaintiff’s name, but did not have been deposited, and confirmed the fact that the contact was cut off with the named beneficiary, and the communication was conducted with G, and then confirmed that the Plaintiff did not have the account in the Plaintiff’s name with G, together with the document confirming that the Plaintiff did not have the account in the Plaintiff’s name.