1. The Defendant is limited to the Plaintiff on February 7, 2014 with respect to the motor vehicles indicated in the attached list.

In addition to the purport of the arguments in Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 7, and 9 (including the number of pages), the defendant agreed on February 2, 2013 to borrow KRW 5,500,000 from the above name in the place where the plaintiff was absent any dispute between the parties. On the other hand, the defendant's vehicle's key, the defendant's resident registration certificate, the certificate of personal seal impression, the registration certificate, and the automobile register as stated in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the above vehicle") were delivered to Eul, and the defendant's personal seal certificate was delivered to Eul. Accordingly, C affixed the defendant's personal seal certificate to each of the above persons. The defendant's personal seal certificate was affixed on each of the above vehicles, and the defendant's personal seal certificate was affixed on the letter of delegation transfer and the letter of waiver of the vehicle, and the defendant's vehicle registration certificate was delivered on February 7, 2014.

As seen earlier, in light of the fact that the Defendant issued the key of the instant vehicle to the name defecter, the copy of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, the certificate of personal seal impression, the registration certificate, and the register of automobiles to the owner of the instant vehicle, and that the Defendant issued the certificate of personal seal impression to the owner of the instant vehicle to the owner of the instant vehicle, the Defendant recognized that C may transfer the foregoing documents and the ownership of the said vehicle to a third party in accordance with the exercise of the security right to the instant vehicle, while recognizing that C is unable to repay the borrowed money from the above name defecter.