logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.10.17 2014노2461
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendants (the defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for one year and eight months, and the defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the confession of Defendant A to commit each of the instant crimes and the fact that Defendant A is against his mistake, and that the female her mothers support the Defendant’s parents and children, the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes despite having been punished for six times due to the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, the violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, and the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence), and the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes, and in particular, from the time when two months have not passed since the completion of the execution of each of the instant crimes on December 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months due to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence), and from the time when two months have not passed since the execution of each of the instant crimes was completed, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s punishment is too unfair.

B. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as Defendant B’s confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, the Defendant informed the person who committed a narcotics-related crime to an investigation agency and cooperation in the criminal investigation, the Defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case despite having been punished for ten times as a crime of violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, a crime of violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, and a crime of violation of the Psychotropic Drugs Control Act, etc., and in particular, the Defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case on March 14, 2014, which was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and four months as of February 8, 2013, which was prior to each of the crimes of this case, and committed each of the crimes of this case on March 14, 2014.

arrow